At 10:29 PM -0500 2/7/03, Al Shealy wrote:
Paul Brandon wrote:
 That may well be, but ....
 If an individual honestly believes that evolution is not true and
 thus rejects the scientific method (yes, I believe that this
 assumption is justified), their clinical practice will be driven by a
 different set of assumptions; ones that I feel are not appropriate
 for a clinical psychologist.
 I would suggest that such an individual would be more comfortable and
 appropriate in a theologically oriented counseling program, and would
 be willing to write a recommendation to such a program.
 --
If the letter of rec. is supposed to be our estimate of a student's
ability to perform in graduate school or as a professional, religious
beliefs should ONLY be relevant if they are indeed correlated with
graduate school performance or professional performance. Where is the
evidence that religious beliefs are correlated with either of these? And
where is the evidence that people who don't believe in evolution can't (or
don't) perform as well in non-theologically oriented counseling programs?

Surely you have data to support such beliefs, right Paul?
Only the generic observation that peoples beliefs do affect their (other) behavior.
I'd be amazed if it were otherwise, since it would bring into question a rather large body of data.
--
* PAUL K. BRANDON [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* Psychology Dept Minnesota State University, Mankato *
* 23 Armstrong Hall, Mankato, MN 56001 ph 507-389-6217 *
* http://www.mankato.msus.edu/dept/psych/welcome.html *

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to