Ah, me. And what does "intellect" mean? It comes from the latin,
intellectus, which means "to perceive, to understand." Must such
perception and understanding--and expression--be so lateral? If you're
going to talk semantics, isn't thinking a "skill" or "talent." You know,
that highly touted "critical thinking skill" stuff.
So, what's wrong with Gardner's or Goleman's "emotional perception or
understanding" or "multiple perceptions or understandings"--and
expressions--other than it may challenge traditional thinking here and
there.
Oh, one more thing, what is it specifically that's faulty with their
research?
My amateur two cents.
Make it a good day.
--Louis--
Louis Schmier www.therandomthoughts.com
Department of History www.halcyon.com/arborhts/louis.html
Valdosta State University
Valdosta, Georgia 31698 /~\ /\ /\
(229-333-5947) /^\ / \ / /~ \ /~\__/\
/ \__/ \/ / /\ /~ \
/\/\-/ /^\___\______\_______/__/_______/^\
-_~ / "If you want to climb mountains, \ /^\
_ _ / don't practice on mole hills" -\____
---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
