This one is even better than the "Passion of the Christ" one a few weeks ago. <grin> I'm amazed that any of us can manage to take any of this seriously, and believe that his posts are honest attempts to discuss psychology coming from someone who is who he says he is.
Still, I've got to admit that I really enjoyed reading this one - it more-or-less captures several years of this stuff in a single post, doesn't it? He managed to forget to point out that we've also failed to give enough credit to black Egyptians for developing everything we know about psychology, though. And I guess I'm old-fashioned and narrow-minded, but I thought the term was "Eurocentric". When did that turn into "Eurogenic"*? And shouldn't "Ad hominen" be spelled differently**? Paul * Or would still using the same term be the "same old recycled thang", like a recurring memo from the Dean, or a yearly spring break warning? **i.e., "Ad hominoid"? Okay, that was a cheap shot, but I couldn't resist, and there hardly seems any reason to... > TIPS: > > - has seen a decline of 30 percent of subscribers > - important classroom issues are in decline > -it is the same old same old recycled thang > - too Eurogenic > -decline in posts from international tipsters > - has failed to attract African-American and Latino profs > - a recent survey would indicate that there are only two black > tipsters and one Cuban and no moslems > - Ad hominen attacks on one tipster is on the rise from Jewish tipsters > -we have lost our sense of humor and tolerance for ambiguity(the > quintessential intelligent factor) > > Michael Sylvester,PhD > Daytona Beach,Florida > > --- > You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
