The evidence from your past posts is that "you don't think." Therefore you are not.
Further, there is an amazing lack of evidence that you teach. Therefore again you are not.
Ray Rogoway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think that you're putting de horse before de Carte. -- * PAUL K. BRANDON [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Psychology Department 507-389-6217 * * 23 Armstrong Hall Minnesota State University, Mankato * * http://www.mnsu.edu/dept/psych/welcome.html *
--- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
