|
While I'm more or les
inclined to agree with your analysis, Nancy, I think what they
journalist (NOTE!) means by this is that Flew is convinced by a kind of
"inference to the best explanation" on the issue of first cause of the
universe, rather than on the basis of a "personal experience of the
divine" or some such. (Isn't there a point where the "best" available
explanation is so bad that it is not worth inferring, even pro tem, and
so we should just hold off adhering to *any* specific belief on the
matter until we think of something better?) It is intersting that religious folk are celebrating Flew's "conversion" as a "victory." There was a time when one would have been excommunicated (or worse) for "merely" being a deist of this sort. Averroes got in a good deal of trouble for this sort of thing, as I recall. (And some American evangelists spend a good deal of time trying to *deny* that Thomas Jefferson and several other of the "Founding Fathers" were deists of pretty much this same ilk.) Regards, -- Christopher D. Green Department of Psychology York University Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3J 1P3 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
- Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Christopher D. Green
- Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Stephen Black
- Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Paul Brandon
- RE: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Paul Smith
- Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Christopher D. Green
- Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Jim Guinee
- RE: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Jim Guinee
- Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Jim Guinee
- RE: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Paul Smith
- RE: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Paul Brandon
- RE: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Dennis Goff
