|
Joe, I would have the student file an academic
appeal (at least that is what we call it here). It seems unfair to allow the subjective
subtraction of points when it is not objectively defined within the syllabus. To answer your question more directly—I
do not see any defense for that method of grading and the professor should be
called to task for it. Secondly, an
academic appeal or appeal to the Academic Dean/Provost or Faculty Senate seems
appropriate to me. I make it a point to make everything as
explicit and objective as possible when writing a syllabus. That way, both the students and I know
exactly what is expected of us. Be Well, Chuck ********************************* Charles M. Huffman, Ph.D. Chair, Psychology Dept. (606) 539-4419 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ********************************* From: Hatcher, Joe
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi colleagues, My student is in a
difficult position. I am wondering, first of all, what the defenses are
for such a system of grading and, second, if you have any advice I can pass on
to my student. Joe Hatcher
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
Title: grading system described on syllabus
- grading system described on syllabus Hatcher, Joe
- RE: grading system described on syllabus Charles M. Huffman
- RE: grading system described on syllabus Shearon, Tim
- Re: grading system described on syllabus Julie Penley
- RE: grading system described on syllabus Melvyn King
- Re: grading system described on syllabus don allen
