At 11:18 AM -0600 1/13/06, Jim Dougan wrote:
I friend of mine was a grad student in clinical at UCLA, and did some clinical work with some of the McMartin kids. He was pretty confident that *something* had occurred because the children just didn't test normally on some standardized measures. He was also pretty clear that the prosecution had failed to prove its case.
Was this before or after the kids had been repeatedly questioned? That itself might have been the *something*. -- The best argument against Intelligent Design is that fact that people believe in it. * PAUL K. BRANDON [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Psychology Dept Minnesota State University * * 23 Armstrong Hall, Mankato, MN 56001 ph 507-389-6217 * * http://www.mnsu.edu/dept/psych/welcome.html * --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
