At 2:34 PM -0500 9/26/06, Michael Scoles wrote:
The studies on which this criticism (and some others) is based come from cross-sectional research. That is, at this point in time, how do 5th-graders in charter schools perform compared to traditional public schools?
As schools of choice, charter schools are attractive to parents who do not see traditional public schools as serving their children. Students that are succeeding in traditional public schools tend to stay there. Charter schools often serve students who, for various reasons, are not as prepared for an academic environment.
Or who have parents who are more willing and able to be involved in their children's education.
Selection bias.
The trend in assessment/accountability now is to move towards longitudinal assessment, so that the gains made by individual children can be assessed and compared across different types of educational programs.
Random assignment is difficult, 'tho, except where lottery
systems randomly accept some students and not others.
This has been looked at in private (parochial) school voucher
programs; I'm not sure that it has in charter schools, although it's
possible.
I'm not sure what "constraints" Christopher is talking about. As public schools, charter schools generally have to meet the same reporting requirements as traditional schools. It is hard to put contraints on basic curriculum requirements under those conditions. The flexibility comes in methods.
In theory.
In practice, charter schools are given more leeway in choosing
curriculum as well (methods and curricula often come packaged).
>>> "Christopher D. Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 9/26/2006 2:17 PM >>>
Yes, especially considering that charter school do not increase students' academic performance: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/education/july-dec04/charter_8-18.html
(but do enhance the ability of parents to strongly constrain the kinds of intellectual materials to which their children are exposed).
--
The best argument against Intelligent
Design is that fact that
people believe in it.
* PAUL K. BRANDON [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* Psychology Dept Minnesota State University *
* 23 Armstrong Hall, Mankato, MN 56001 ph 507-389-6217 *
people believe in it.
* PAUL K. BRANDON [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* Psychology Dept Minnesota State University *
* 23 Armstrong Hall, Mankato, MN 56001 ph 507-389-6217 *
*
http://krypton.mnsu.edu/~pkbrando/ *
---
To make changes to your subscription go to:
http://acsun.frostburg.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=tips&text_mode=0&lang=english
