At 11:55 AM -0600 2/18/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT!?!?!?!?!
It's being widely denied by his closest friends and family. It seems to be
a nice explanation that can be wrapped up in a bow and everyone can move
on.
Annette
I am not sure how familiar you are with experimental design.There is a
design classified as an ABAB where A stands for baseline and B the
intoduction of the treatment.Behavior will be different under those two
conditions.The second A designates a return to baseline.It is obvious that
the shooter had returned to baseline due to the absence of the treatment
condition(his medication).Medication does not necessarily change behavior
but may provide favorable conditions
for effective and sustainable social and cognitive behavior changeHope this
helps.
An ABAB design is usually a single case experimental design.
For it to be a valid experiment, conditions other than the
experimental condition (in this case medication) must be held
constant -- obviously not the case here.
--
The best argument against Intelligent Design is that fact that
people believe in it.
* PAUL K. BRANDON [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* Psychology Dept Minnesota State University *
* 23 Armstrong Hall, Mankato, MN 56001 ph 507-389-6217 *
* http://krypton.mnsu.edu/~pkbrando/ *
---
To make changes to your subscription contact:
Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
