No, I am suggesting that going off the medication is not an issue; apparently he had not been on medication for very many years and was doing just fine all fo that time and prior to this breakdown. It's not a matter of ABAB.
Annette Annette Kujawski Taylor, Ph.D. Professor of Psychology University of San Diego 5998 Alcala Park San Diego, CA 92110 619-260-4006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---- Original message ---- >Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:55:09 -0500 >From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [tips] hindsight (20/20) vs. foresight (?/?) >To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)" <[email protected]> > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)" ><[email protected]> >Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 12:28 PM >Subject: Re: [tips] hindsight (20/20) vs. foresight (?/?) > > >> HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT!?!?!?!?! >> >> It's being widely denied by his closest friends and family. It seems to be >> a nice explanation that can be wrapped up in a bow and everyone can move >> on. >> >> Annette >> > I am not sure how familiar you are with experimental design.There is a >design classified as an ABAB where A stands for baseline and B the >intoduction of the treatment.Behavior will be different under those two >conditions.The second A designates a return to baseline.It is obvious that >the shooter had returned to baseline due to the absence of the treatment >condition(his medication).Medication does not necessarily change behavior >but may provide favorable conditions >for effective and sustainable social and cognitive behavior changeHope this >helps. > >Michael Sylvester,PhD >Daytona Beach,Florida > > >--- >To make changes to your subscription contact: > >Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --- To make changes to your subscription contact: Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
