I have been a silent member of tips for a while, but this is an interesting 
issue for me as someone who once tried to address through the empirical 
literature, and, as someone whose children (two out of three) were/are vocal, 
and, I have gone through some lengthy and intense single-parent periods. Alot 
can be said about it, I suspect, from many different angles, but for now I am 
curious to know if anyone on tips still believes this an issue worth seeking an 
answer to from the classic learning angle .. (or even classic attachment 
theory). 

A case can be made that much crying is not purposefully manipulative, and that 
the classic "laws of learning" explain only a small % of the variability in 
crying in younger children. 

And from a totally different angle (i hope this is not misunderstood), how many 
times in the course of a typical modern parents' day (and I am thinking amongst 
us commoners, not those with nannies) do parents have the choice, and time to 
ponder that choice in a simple yes/no fashion, and the luxury to impliment the 
choice. I suspect they, like me most days, am much more curious to know how to 
afford more domestic help so we CAN attend to children when they are 
distressed. I am also curious to know how many parents have the ability to 
actually ignore crying ... I knew some people who used to put their child to 
bed in the farthest room in the house so they could impliment the "ignore" 
advice and not be disturbed (I believe James Watson advocated the ignore 
approach ... how many childen did he raise!). I always considered these parents 
the exception to the rule that crying (and its effects on the listener) has 
been honed through zillions of years of evolution, and cannot be manipulated or 
altered readily. On the other hand, when parents choose to ignore, they usually 
do not do so as a detached intellectual choice lol So I wonder about the 
practical significance of the question, given the difficulty isolating a crying 
model not overwhelmed by genetic/adaptation issues and the rarity of 
opportunity to get something practical out of the answer. But this is not to 
disrespect the question, I do believe it is a classic in terms of watching the 
theoretical frameworks struggle with it.

John Kulig
Professor of Psychology
Plymouth State University
Plymouth NH 03264
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





----- Original Message -----
From: "José Ferreira Alves" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 11:12:30 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: RE: [tips] allowing infants to cry









I think this is a classic problem. 

  

When I teach behavioral procedures I give the example of a child crying being 
picked up by her or his parent as an example of positive reinforcement.  In 
similar circumstances the baby will cry again and this last crying is the best 
evidence that there was positive reinforce. But I alert my students that this 
example does not teach us that we should not pick up a child when she or he 
cries. And I give the example of attachment theory as a theory that suggests 
that we should promote secure attachments. I do not know anything about what 
Laura Spiegel said but I advice you to see if she has some theory for doing 
that suggestion. What results are more adequate or positive when we do not pick 
a child that is crying, and why. In behavioral theory we only have a theory of 
behavior and not of bonding, of attachment. You have to see what theory is she 
formulating. 

  

I think these tensions and apparent contradictions are rich moments of 
learning…. 

My best 

Jose 

  

_____________________________________ 

José Ferreira Alves, Ph.D 

Program in adult development and aging 

Department of Psychology (IEP) 

University of Minho 

Campus de Gualtar 

4710-057 Braga - Portugal 

Tel: +351253604233 (office) 

Fax: +351253604224 

Tel cel. +351919378514 

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

www.cipsi.uminho.pt 

www.iep.uminho.pt 

www.uminho.pt 

  

  

  



De: kleisslers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Enviada: terça-feira, 17 de Junho de 2008 15:02 
Para: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS) 
Assunto: [tips] allowing infants to cry 

  

  


Hi Tipsters, 


I have a question about allowing babies to cry.My previous readings (5 years or 
so ago) indicated that one should pick up a crying baby quickly, because this 
would promote a secure attachment, and in the long run a securely attached baby 
cries less as well. My latest reading (e.g. Laura Spiegel) recommends letting 
babies "cry it out", indicating that this is good for them physically  and 
emotionally. Does anyone know which approach has better support in the 
literature? 


  


Thanks, 



Kathleen Kleissler, Assistant Prof. 


Psychology Dept. 


Kutztown University 


Kutztown, PA 19530 


610-683-4465 


[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  --- 
To make changes to your subscription contact: 

Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
--- 
To make changes to your subscription contact: 

Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 

---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Reply via email to