Since the assumption of this thread seems to be that all research on the link 
between alcohol and cancer is correlational and epidemiological, I thought I 
would do a Google Scholar search on alcohol and cancer and see what is out 
there. What was out there was approximately 814,000 hits. Of course these could 
all be correlational studies (and many are probably duplicates) so I clicked on 
the second one in the list and found an interesting article on possible 
biological mechanisms (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2686698). I also 
found a link to a review of studies of alcohol and cancer as early as 1986 
(http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3035901). The last line of the abstract 
was, “Animal models are needed in which effects of ethanol on carcinogenesis 
can be consistently demonstrated and which can then be used to examine 
mechanisms”.  I thought it unlikely that no experimental work had ensued in the 
intervening years. Indeed, a 2004 review article is available full text on the 
web at: http://alcalc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/39/3/155 that 
includes sections on Animal Models and Possible Biological Mechanisms. The 
reference list of the article has links to many related articles available in 
full-text.

Rick

Dr. Rick Froman, Chair
Division of Humanities and Social Sciences
Professor of Psychology
Box 3055
John Brown University
2000 W. University Siloam Springs, AR  72761
[email protected]
(479)524-7295
http://tinyurl.com/DrFroman

"That we are in the midst of crisis is now well understood....Homes have been 
lost; jobs shed; businesses shuttered. Our health care is too costly; our 
schools fail too many; and each day brings further evidence that the ways we 
use energy strengthen our adversaries and threaten our planet. These are the 
indicators of crisis, subject to data and statistics. Less measurable but no 
less profound is a sapping of confidence across our land — a nagging fear that 
America's decline is inevitable, and that the next generation must lower its 
sights."
Barack Obama, Inaugural Address, January 20, 2009


From: Christopher D. Green [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 4:15 PM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: Re: [tips] BBC NEWS | Health | Drink a day increases cancer risk


Amadio, Dean wrote:

Are you saying that we should ignore all non-experimental research?
Of course not. I saying we should draw from correlational research the 
conclusions that are justified by correlational research.


I'm concerned you're giving this message to your students! This is the 
justification the tobacco industry used to say that there is no evidence that 
smoking causes lung cancer in humans.
But they were simply wrong. Part of it was correlational, but there was 
(eventually) lots of good animal and histological and biochemcial research that 
proved what the correlations suggested might be the case. It might well have 
turned out otherwise. It took good research, not correlational speculations to 
establish the causal connection.

Your argument seems to be that just because one famous correlational  
connection proved (upon further experimental research) to be underpinned by a 
causal connection (tobacco-cancer), that all such correlations must be 
underpinned by a causal connection (alcohol-cancer). Obviously, that is a very 
poor inference.


 we have to adopt a wait and see and skeptical, but perhaps somewhat prudent 
attitude. This is precisely the message I give students.
Telling your students on the basis of merely suggestive research of this sort 
that they should wholly abstain from alcohol is not merely prudent. It is 
alarmist, and unwarranted by the currently available data.




While the BBC article certainly overstated much (as is typical with popular 
media), I think calling these types of studies "ridiculous" is very misleading, 
and in some instances, downright dangerous.
I repeat: Even if the causal connection were established here, the rise in in 
cancer risk would amount to 2 in 10,000. Does that strike you as dangerous? 
That's about the same as the probability of being killed in a car accident (see 
http://www.fearlessflight.com/airplane-disasters-plane-crash-statistics). Do 
you totally abstain from riding in cars for fear of being killed in one?

Regards,
Chris
--


Christopher D. Green
Department of Psychology
York University
Toronto, ON M3J 1P3
Canada



416-736-2100 ex. 66164
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://www.yorku.ca/christo/

==========================


---

To make changes to your subscription contact:



Bill Southerly ([email protected])


---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([email protected])

Reply via email to