There's no doubt about " is damage or complete destruction of sensory hair
cells." The rest is highly suspect, i.e., what the student wrote is not
semantically different enough (for me) to judge that it involves any
synthesis/summary of several ideas. The important thing to me is how things
appear in the rest of the paper, esp just before and after the part quoted
above.
Just my $.02. D
David K. Hogberg, PhD
Professor of Psychology, Emeritus
Albion College, Albion MI 49224
[email protected] home phone: 517/629-4834
>>> "DeVolder Carol L" <[email protected]> 05/10/09 2:17 PM >>>
OK, I need a quick show of hands--plagiarism or not?
Here is the sentence from the paper:
When hearing loss exists, the main cause is damage or complete destruction
of sensory hair cells.
Here is the sentence from the article:
The principle cause of hearing loss is damage to or complete destruction of
sensory hair cells.
I am encountering this so often, I'm starting to question my own judgment.
Thanks,
Carol
Carol L. DeVolder, Ph.D.
Professor of Psychology
Chair, Department of Psychology
St. Ambrose University
518 West Locust Street
Davenport, Iowa 52803
Phone: 563-333-6482
e-mail: [email protected]
web: http://web.sau.edu/psychology/psychfaculty/cdevolder.htm
The contents of this message are confidential and may not be shared with anyone
without permission of the sender.
---
To make changes to your subscription contact:
Bill Southerly ([email protected])
---
To make changes to your subscription contact:
Bill Southerly ([email protected])
