Dear Michael,

 

You make a good case for arguing that behaviours may be perceived differently 
in different cultures. Such information may help us understand these behaviours 
in different situations.

 

But here is the nub of my question:

 

If you were teaching a class and found people in a certain group (say Muslims 
or football players) to be copying each other or engaging in activities that we 
as professors prohibit in our courses, how would you deal with it?

 

Sincerely,

 

Stuart

 

___________________________________________________________________

 

Stuart J. McKelvie, Ph.D.,     Phone: (819)822-9600, Extension 2402

Department of Psychology,              Fax: (819)822-9661

Bishop's University,

2600 College Street,

Sherbrooke,

Québec J1M 1Z7,

Canada.

 

E-mail: [email protected]

 

Bishop's University Psychology Department Web Page:

http://www.ubishops.ca/ccc/div/soc/psy 
<blocked::http://www.ubishops.ca/ccc/div/soc/psy> 

___________________________________________________________

From: michael sylvester [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: June 5, 2009 6:30 PM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: Re: [tips] Cross-cultural for Tipsters (2)

 

 

 

        Consider this:

         

        "What we call cheating may be interpreted differentially.I have noticed 
that among some football players working out assignments together or even 
sharing answers or allowing other football players to copy is almost like a(n) 
obligation-as if a good football player should help another football player.So 
is there a sport-cultural imperative?I taught at an institution where it has 
been said that football players were big cheats."

         

        Could I please ask the writer to state categorically whether he is or 
is not implying that copying someone else's work is wrong for some people and 
acceptable for others?

         

        Sincerely,

         

        Stuart

         

         

        ___________________________________________________________________

         

         Stuart: you are assuming that the Eurocentric consensus applies 
equally to all situations. Just consider this from Semantic theory: if there is 
not a word for cheating in a certain culture then cheating does not exist in 
that culture.I can relate this to my studies of stuttering across cultures.Way 
way back Speech Pathologists at Iowa embarked on a research program to 
investigate stuttering among native Americans.

        They could not find one stuttering Indian so they asserted that 
stuttering did not exist among certain native American tribes because there was 
no word for stuttering in the native American language .Andsince I am the 
cross-cultural dude on Tips,I have made similar enquiries re the Mapuche people 
of Chile.

        What I am implying is that among cultures where cheating,bribery and so 
on are an everyday affair

        then the value of those constructs are not significantly meaningful. 
The  wife of the late Egyptian

        President Sadat,supposedly got a PhD without her doing most of the work 
herself.And she got a six figure salary to teach one or two classes in some U.S 
institution. So whereas your approach is rational

        it may not be exported to some cultural reality.

        Hope this helps.

        Michael Sylvester,PhD

        Daytona Beach,Florida

         

 

---

To make changes to your subscription contact:



Bill Southerly ([email protected])

---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([email protected])

Reply via email to