I'm not sure that going back to the old reply form is necessary. Personally, I don't
pay
much attention to the CCs on a TIPS reply. Any confusion about which person is being
addressed is usually clarified by . . . umm, reading our e-mails carefully.
--
"Linda M. Woolf" wrote:
> Hi Mike and Y'all,
>
> Okay, I think we have yet another reason to re-evaluate the reply setting for TIPS.
>
> It was clear to me that Mike was replying to Louis. What I was concerned about was
> the cc. that appeared on both Mike and Louis' posts that gave the impression that I
> started the "humane" cruelty idea.
>
*****************************************************************
* Mike Scoles * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* Department of Psychology * voice: (501) 450-5418 *
* University of Central Arkansas * fax: (501) 450-5424 *
* Conway, AR 72035-0001 * *
********* http://www.coe.uca.edu/psych/scoles/index.html ********
