On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, Linda M. Woolf wrote:

> Hi Tipsters,
> 
> I'm not so sure that we have a genocide gene.  In fact, I would strongly argue
> that we do not.
> 
> Certainly, many would argue that human cruelty is part of our make-up as
> humans.  However,  individuals who raise this as a hypothesis almost always
> counter that the capacity for human kindness, empathy, and altruistic behavior
> are also part of our make-up.  It is not as one sided as you present.
> 
> Additionally, a genetic predisposition for violence as a monocausal explanation
> of genocide is not support by the data.  The roots of genocide are multicausal
> and interact.  The roots of genocide include cultural, intergroup, intragroup,
> and individual factors that occur
> within specific at-risk historical and political contexts.  Early warning signs
> that exist/develop prior to a genocidal action and the role of bystanders. Some
> of the specific factors interacting to form the foundation for genocide include
> degree of governmental control over individual and group behaviors,  crisis
> (e.g. economic or political) on group or individual identity, nationalism, and
> bystander involvement levels. Secondary factors which can escalate the potential
> for genocidal actions and their interactions include (but are not limited to)
> the use of aggression as a traditional form of conflict resolution and its
> relationship to socio-cultural patterns of obedience to authority,
> in-group/out-group behaviors, pseudospeciation, moral exclusion, and
> conformity.  Additionally, genocide proponents use secondary factor manipulation
> to facilitate perpetrator behavior and inhibit bystander behavior.   Within this
> broader cultural context, family patterns and their relationship to
> scapegoating, victim dehumanization, and individual perpetrator acts of genocide
> are involved.
> 

  However,it does appear that lots of conflict are due to disputes as to
the ownership of territories and land.As a matter of fact,returning the
land to the original inhabitants could be a step in help solving the
problem. 
Guatemala still claims Belize.
Should people in the U.S be considered illegal immigramts in Mexican and
Native American territories?

Michael Sylvester
Daytona Beach,Florida

Reply via email to