Louis_Schmier wrote: > > Linda, and you don't think scientists are above bias? Many students > don't like or like community because of their experience and schooling, > not because of any DNA coding. > An excellent example of observer bias. I don't believe I said anything about statistics. Just said there was a major bias with anecdotal data. The scientific method includes a broad range of techniques which include both qualitative and quantitative research. Anecdotal data does not fit into the category of either forms of research. And another example: Did I say anything about DNA or the differences being genetically based? I simply argued that there are individual differences and we should not assume that every student learns best in a proscribed manner. Thanks for proving my point! People see what they want to see with anecdotal evidence. Linda -- Linda M. Woolf, Ph.D. Associate Professor - Psychology
- Re: Classroom as Family or... Paul Brandon
- Re: Classroom as Family or... Louis_Schmier
- Re: Classroom as Family or... Paul Brandon
- Re: Classroom as Family or... Sharon Carnahan
- Re: Classroom as Family or Hie... Paul Brandon
- Re: Classroom as Family or... Louis_Schmier
- Re: Classroom as Family or... Paul Brandon
- Re: Classroom as Family or... John W. Kulig
- Re: Classroom as Family or Hie... Linda M. Woolf, Ph.D.
- Re: Classroom as Family or... Louis_Schmier
- Re: Classroom as Family or... Linda M. Woolf, Ph.D.
- Re: Classroom as Family or... Louis_Schmier
- Re: Classroom as Family or... Linda M. Woolf, Ph.D.
- Re: Classroom as Family or... Paul Brandon
- Re: Classroom as Family or Hierarchy? Michael Sylvester
- Re: Classroom as Family or Hierarchy? Louis_Schmier
- Re: Classroom as Family or Hierarchy? Richard Pisacreta
- Re: Re: Classroom as Family or Hierarchy? Jim Guinee
- Re: Re: Classroom as Family or Hierarchy? Paul Brandon
- Re: Re: Classroom as Family or Hierarchy? jim clark
