Mike:  

Tenure, like I said:  fear and self-preservation in a we/them context.

Pedagogy:  you evaded my question.

Make it a good day.

      --Louis--


Louis Schmier                                http://www.therandomthoughts.com
Department of History  
http://www.therandomthoughts.edublogs.org               
Valdosta State University             
Valdosta, Georgia 31698                 /\   /\  /\               /\
(229-333-5947)                                /^\\/  \/   \   /\/\__/\ \/\
                                                        /     \/   \_ \/ /   \/ 
/\/   
\      /\
                                                       //\/\/ /\    
\__/__/_/\_\    \_/__\
                                                /\"If you want to climb 
mountains,\ /\
                                            _ /  \    don't practice on mole 
hills" -


-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Palij [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 11:13 AM
To: Louis Schmier
Cc: Mike Palij
Subject: Re: [tips] I need a break...

Hi Louis,

As I teach my students, when writing, if you make an assertion of "fact"
based on empirical research, you should provide a citation and reference
to the source that specifically supports the statement you are making.
To rattle off a list of names is the equivalent of hand-waving:  it does
not provide the evidence one needs to support their assertion and leaves
it to the questioner to discover what the source of evidence is.  And
as any empirical research knows, to claim that "so and so" established
something, is a pretty empty claim unless current research support it.
Case in point:  most of what Piaget had claimed is now known either
to be wrong (e.g., age at which object permanance occurs; it has become
a cottage industry in last few decades for people to show where Piaget
was wrong) or subject to different interpretation that departs significantly
from Piaget's theoretical position (e.g., Piaget's stage theory vs continuous
development where an infant or child is learning rules that apply to
situation is not dependent upon acheiving some cognitive stage).  This
would be obvious to a psychologist with research training.  If you want
to convince me of your position, cite peer-reviewed research articles
in the last 10 years to support your assertions.

As for tenure, those without it know that they bend or break rules at
their own peril because most people without tenure or a full-time
position know that they may not be re-appointed for any arbitrary
reason.  And the reasons that the administration may give for 
non-reappointment do not have to be the "real" reason why they
are not appointing, the reasons given have just to be legal and
provide no basis for the non-reappointed person to sue the university.

Take care,
-Mike Palij

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Louis Schmier" <[email protected]>
To: "'Mike Palij'" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 10:51 AM
Subject: RE: [tips] I need a break...


Mike, I thought I have always been referring to the findings of science, that 
systematic
research to which you refer, to which I have referring, reading, reflecting 
upon, and
testing out in my classes:  Grasha, Richlin, Perry, Piaget, Mills, Deci, 
Harlow, Amabile,
Senge, Flaste, Nelson, Eison, Gardner, Dees, Gladwell, Drucker, Zakrajsek, 
Palmer,
Mckeachie, Bain, Lowman, Csikszentmihalyi, Dweck, Brooks, Boyatzis, Goleman, 
Seligman,
Rogers, Bern., and a host of et als I have on my shelf.  

If their work is not to be accepted as systematic research, what systematic 
research do
you rely upon for your classroom pedagogy, not the content of your courses, the 
pedagogy,
the teaching methods and techniques, the educational philosophy, the purpose of 
it all
that I can read, reflect upon, and apply?  

As for the tenure stuff, which most professions do not have, all you're doing 
is excusing
and validating the inhibiting fear and subsequent kowtowing to "what will 
others think"
that pervades our campuses which we allow to compromise ourselves in our quest 
for a job
guarantee, a quest of which is in itself a misuse and an abuse of tenure 
itself.  

Make it a good day.

--Louis--


Louis Schmier http://www.therandomthoughts.com
Department of History 
http://www.therandomthoughts.edublogs.org 
Valdosta State University             
Valdosta, Georgia 31698 /\ /\ /\    /\
(229-333-5947) /^\\/ \/ \ /\/\__/\ \/\
/ \/ \_ \/ / \/ /\/ 
\ /\
//\/\/ /\ \__/__/_/\_\ \_/__\
/\"If you want to climb mountains,\ /\
_ / \ don't practice on mole hills" -


-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Palij [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 9:35 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Cc: Mike Palij
Subject: RE: [tips] I need a break...

Just a couple of points:

(1) Personally, I usually pay no mind to what Louis says
about teaching.  He's not a psychologist (though one doesn't 
have to be a psychologist to say meaningful things about 
teaching), he's a tenured professor (which shouldn't be held 
against him but might blind him to the fact that that status 
grants him rights and privileges not available to junior faculty, 
adjuncts, or graduate students teaching courses on their own), 
and typically relies solely on his own experience instead of 
systematic research on what works and doesn't work (it is
remarkable how many people who rely just on their experience
fail to appreciate the concept of external validity).  Louis fails 
to appreciate the role of his own biases and the how the specific 
environment he operates in affects what he thinks as well as 
what he thinks he knows. When he purports to provide "wisdom" 
on a subject, like "if you don't feel like it, don't teach because it 
will be obvious to students", he appears to think that this is a 
"universal law" applicable to all instructors in all courses while in 
truth he may be able to get away with it but someone whose contract
specifies that a certain number of hours of classroom instruction 
would be foolish to follow his advice especially if it gets back
to whoever their supervisor is.

(2) In general, I recommend that instructors plan for an activity
or activities for what I call "My Dog Died Today".  That is, one
can never tell when some personally catastrophic event will occur
but one will not be able to take time off from class.  One probably
can't be bubbly and effervescent if one's dog died or one's child
was admitted to the hospital or one's home burned down or a family 
member was kidnapped while traveling in a foreign country (which 
happened to one of my students who apologized for being out of it
in class) or fill in your own personal tragedy.  In these kinds of situations 
I think is wise to prepare:

(a)  to have a some video that is generally relevant to the topic
of your class that can be used to fill the period and leave time
for reactions and discussion afterward -- this reduces the amount
of time one has to spend speaking which in fact might be difficult
to do given the circumstance.  Using material from various PBS
series would be good, especially if one can access the Annenberg
website; see:
http://www.learner.org/resources/series150.html

(b) an activity that would allow the students to form small groups,
work on a problem or some goal directed activity which will take
some time and then report on their conclusions and moderate
subsequent discussion.  I'm sure Tipster can provide pointers to
soruces for this kind of thing in different areas of psychology.

The key thing is to determine what can be done in the class period
that would be relevant either to the topic currently being covered or
provides insight into some specific aspect of the course's content
while reducing the amount of time that the instructor has to speak
and physically act.  Given the nature of the events I'm referring to,
one wants to reduce the likelihood that one might break down in
front of students, experience wild mood swings, or present other
behaviors reflecting how upset or badly they feel but trying to keep
it under control.  If students don't know the context, they might
react badly to strange behavior on the instructor's part.

True, I'm really talking about those days when something really bad
happens which really makes one not want to teach but one has to
anyway.  If its just "I don't feel like teaching today", then maybe
Louis' advice makes sense. 1/2 :-)

-Mike Palij
New York University
[email protected]




---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here:
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13368.9b8fe41d7a9a359029570f1d2ef42440&n=T&l=tips&o=1088
or send a blank email to
leave-1088-13368.9b8fe41d7a9a359029570f1d2ef42...@fsulist.frostburg.edu


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=1093
or send a blank email to 
leave-1093-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to