Totally agree, we're all preaching to the choir on this one! But just in case 
anyone is ever confronted with a (only) slightly more sophisticated argument 
that there IS a missing link between us and the common ancestor, Dawkins does a 
nice job with this in his 'Greatest Show on Earth'. It was a clever analogy he 
uses. viz, as we development from birth to death we change ever so slightly 
such that we don't see week to week or month to month changes. Yet we classify 
human development into prenatal, neonate, infant, toddler .... stages, each 
with a static 'picture'. If we just look at the static pictures we see jumps, 
not continuity. Our fossil record resembles these pictures, so we see Homo 
habilis here and Homo erectus there, and with every new discovery some people 
will say great, but where is the missing link between any two of these fossils? 
Point is, there are many existing intermediate steps already in museums, we 
just can't capture the gradual continuities any more than we can in our mind's 
eye see a human morph from toddler to childhood. 

==========================
John W. Kulig 
Professor of Psychology 
Plymouth State University 
Plymouth NH 03264 
==========================


----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher D. Green" <[email protected]>
To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 11:50:00 AM
Subject: Re: [tips] Evolutionary question




The antecedent of the conditional is false. Humans did not evolve from monkeys. 
Humans and modern monkeys evolved from a common ancestor. Modern monkeys and 
modern humans continue to evolve, each along their own evolutionary paths. 

(I can't believe I actually have to say such a thing.) 

Chris 
-- 



Christopher D. Green 
Department of Psychology 
York University 
Toronto, ON M3J 1P3 
Canada 



416-736-2100 ex. 66164 
[email protected] 
http://www.yorku.ca/christo/ 

========================== 

michael sylvester wrote: 





Christine O'Donnell,the Tea party republican senatorial candidate for Delaware, 
has questioned human evolutionary theory. "if we are descended from monkeys,why 
ain't monkeys still evolving?",she asked. 
Maybe our Darwin wannabees on Tips can provide an answer. 

Michael "omnicentric" Sylvester,PhD 
Daytona Beach,Florida 


--- 

You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected] . 

To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13132.a868d710aa4ef67a68807ce4fe8bd0da&n=T&l=tips&o=5175
 

(It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken) 

or send a blank email to 
leave-5175-13132.a868d710aa4ef67a68807ce4fe8bd...@fsulist.frostburg.edu 





--- 

You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected] . 

To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13338.f659d005276678c0696b7f6beda66454&n=T&l=tips&o=5183
 

(It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken) 

or send a blank email to 
leave-5183-13338.f659d005276678c0696b7f6beda66...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=5186
or send a blank email to 
leave-5186-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to