Mike (Palij)- Could you explain why you are asking Chris Green to define those terms when his email was clearly the opposite (at least I read it that way). Shouldn't this question be directed at Michael Smith who originated this thread? Did I miss something? Tim _______________________________ Timothy O. Shearon, PhD Professor, Department of Psychology The College of Idaho Caldwell, ID 83605 email: [email protected]
teaching: intro to neuropsychology; psychopharmacology; general; history and systems "You can't teach an old dogma new tricks." Dorothy Parker ________________________________________ From: Mike Palij [[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2010 10:03 AM To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS) Cc: Mike Palij Subject: Re: [tips] Psychological Science On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 18:21:25 -0800, Christopher Green wrote: >In show business, this is referred to as the problem of believing one's own >press. Please explain yourself. It would help if you provided a definition for science and then identify how all activities covered by psychology fail to meet that definition (I'm particularly interested in why you don't think cognitive neuropsychology, mathematical psychology, and psychophysics fail to meet basic criteria for being a science). If you please, you can also identify/explain what areas of the traditional sciences (i.e., physics, chemistry, biology, etc.) fail to your critieria. -Mike Palij New York University [email protected] --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected]. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13545.bae00fb8b4115786ba5dbbb67b9b177a&n=T&l=tips&o=6957 or send a blank email to leave-6957-13545.bae00fb8b4115786ba5dbbb67b9b1...@fsulist.frostburg.edu --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected]. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=6961 or send a blank email to leave-6961-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
