On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 11:41:44 -0800, Jim Clark wrote in response to Joan
Warmbold's recommendation of the "Talent Code" by Daniel Coyle:
>Hi
>One of the "hot spots" mentioned is Brazil and soccer players.  Here's a 
>passage from a site celebrating Brazilian soccer.
>
>"The majority of the people living in Brazil are in deep poverty. Soccer is 
>the 
>one ticket out of that lifestyle if the talent is learned early enough. Many 
>of 
>the popular soccer players on the Brazil soccer team came from very poor 
>backgrounds, learning soccer at a very young age."
>
>The emerging superstars, relatively numerous at the star level, would be a 
>very tiny proportion of all the poor kids playing soccer in Brazil.  I would 
>be 
>very surprised if genes did not play some part in the radical sorting process 
>that led some few to stardom and the rest to whatever miserable fate awaits 
>them once their dreams of glory are shattered by reality.

Jim's comments triggered my memory for why the Dominican Republic (cited 
on the website as an example of a source of "talent") produces such 
extraordinary
baseball players.  It's not a pretty picture, similar to what Jim describes for
the pool in Brazil, but is given in more detail in the following article:

http://www.commondreams.org/views05/1028-25.htm

I am frequently confused when a person uses the word "talent" because it is
not clear what they mean by it.  Often it is a fundamental attribution error,
that is, it seems to be more valid to explain a person's behavior by focusing 
on 
dispositional variables (e.g., "native intelligence","native skill", "heart", 
desire or
motivation or other personality or person-based variables instead of (a) the
environment in which the behavior is observed or an individual-environment
interaction and/or (b) a history of training and development under a number 
of wise and intelligent mentors).  Like the Just World Hypothesis, many people
like to think that a person's achievements reflect solely on their efforts and
"talents" while in truth the achievement probably could not have been made
without the assistance/input of a large number of people (just watch the ending
credits of a movie to get a sense of how many people need to be involved
in that enterprise).

-Mike Palij
New York University
[email protected]










---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=7688
or send a blank email to 
leave-7688-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to