On 30 April 2011 Mike Palij wrote:
>As teachers, researchers, and psychologists, we need to focus on
>the use of facts, valid modes of argumentation, and critical analysis
>even if powerful forces in society avoid their use.

>http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/04/29/dont-stop-believing/?nl=
todaysheadlines&emc=thab1

Mike had in mind particularly the absurd "birthers" movement, which 
exhibits a specific American right-wing mind-set deriving from dubious 
political and no doubt underlying racists notions. As I expect Mike 
would agree (and the responses to Obama's displaying his passport bear 
this out), most of the people strongly endorsing such views are immune 
to what Mike refers to as "valid modes of argument" in relation to 
their belief, but one would hope that challenging the belief with 
documentable facts will have an effect on the wider public previously 
willing to give credence to the story. Have their been any polls to see 
if Obama's rebuttal has had much effect?

More generally, the problem as I see it with the "valid modes of 
argument" notion is that (e.g., in the case of conspiracy or similar 
theories) the proponents frequently *are* using rational modes of 
argument – within the context of what they take to be the facts of the 
matter. And if some of the basic alleged facts are rebutted, proponents 
come up with rational modes of argument to explain why the rebuttals 
are invalid. Other than by spelling out the ascertainable facts for the 
benefit of those willing to seriously examine the issue, while being 
honest about areas where there is genuine uncertainty, I'm not 
optimistic about the extent that widely-believed dubious contentions 
can be countered.

Allen Esterson
Former lecturer, Science Department
Southwark College, London
[email protected]
http://www.esterson.org

-------------------------------------------------
From:   Mike Palij <[email protected]>
Subject:        When Belief Trumps Facts
Date:   Sat, 30 Apr 2011 08:21:15 -0400
For those who are concerned with how critical thinking (or the lack of 
it)
affects society, an opinion piece in the NY Times on why birtherism and
its offshoots won't die; see:
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/04/29/dont-stop-believing/?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=thab1

As teachers, researchers, and psychologists, we need to focus on the use
of facts, valid modes of argumentation, and critical analysis even if 
powerful
forces in society avoid their use.

-Mike Palij
New York University
[email protected]




---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=10321
or send a blank email to 
leave-10321-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to