On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:24:15 -0700, Joan Warmbold wrote:
>Just to add a footnote to Chris's post, the reality of APA being 'taken
>over by the clinicians years ago' was a major reason for the formation of
>APS 20+ years ago--the Association for Psychological Science.

Well, yes, I know this, I was a charter member of APS.  Even had
a short article in the APS Observer on my research on Age of English
Acquisition and bilingualism in the January 1991 (by Eleanor Siegel
"Spotlight on Research: Achievement Testing: Addressing the War of
Words on Fairness: Bilingualism's Impact on Test Scores"; see:
http://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/archive/index.cfm?issue=96
APS recently provided me a PDF/photocopy of the article; I assume
they'll get around to making it and other Observer articles available some
day).

Anyway, I am a member of both APS and APA (Divisions 1-Gen Psy,
2-STP, 3-Exp Psych, 5 Stats and Measurement -- I had been a member
of Div 52-International Psych but have dropped it but continue to receive
their emails) and there are still non-clinicians there (though the overall
membership numbers have recently started to dip).  I know that
APA is a clinically dominated organization but in the past I felt that
there was some kind of researcher I could vote for.  When I reviewed
this year's candidates, I couldn't find any.

I just checked to see who the current APA president is and she is
Suzanne Bennett Johnson, a clinician from my alma mater Stony Brook
who got her Ph.D. with Dan O'Leary.  I had voted for her because
of the SB connection and the knowledge that she was probably a
decent clinical researcher given her training (SB even sent me an
email announcing her win and hitting me up for a few bucks for the
department).  I guess I'll have to double-check the candidates
again to see if there is anyone worth voting for.

-Mike Palij
New York University
[email protected]

Chris Green has written:
> APA was taken over by the clinicians years ago. Occasionally some
> enthusiastic researcher outs his it her name on the ballot, but unless
> they are stupendously famous, they never win. Many of the candidates now
> don't even have university affiliations. I am still a member, mainly for
> the tiny history division, but I don't much vote for pres anymore.
>
> Chris
> -----
> Christopher D. Green
> Department of Psychology
> York University
> Toronto, ON M6C 1G4
> Canada
>
> [email protected]
>
> On Sep 19, 2012, at 10:31 AM, Michael Palij <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Okay, I finally got around to my email about voting for APA
>> President-Elect and
>> maybe I need a second cup of coffee (I've been trying to cut down) but
>> is it
>> really the case that there is no traditional academic researcher type on
>> the
>> ballot?  And I don't mean clinical researchers either.  And what's up
>> with the
>> guy who says that APA deleted his posts (?) on his facebook page (I
>> don't
>> do facebook or other types of social media so I don't really understand
>> what
>> this guy is saying).
>>
>> Anybody still an APA member?  Anybody still vote for President-Elect?
>> What is going on?

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=20527
or send a blank email to 
leave-20527-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to