The use of 'they' as singular is common and acceptable and has a long history 
(16th century).

http://public.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/they.html
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/tomchiversscience/100184652/if-someone-tells-you-singular-they-is-wrong-please-do-tell-them-to-get-stuffed/

It is also cognitively efficient. (I used the singular they once in a paper for 
a class in graduate school and footnoted the usage with this citation to avoid 
grammar penalties.)

http://pss.sagepub.com/content/8/2/106.abstract
In Search of Gender Neutrality: Is Singular They a Cognitively Efficient 
Substitute for Generic He?

  1.  Julie 
Foertsch<http://pss.sagepub.com/search?author1=Julie+Foertsch&sortspec=date&submit=Submit>1<http://pss.sagepub.com/content/8/2/106.abstract#aff-1>
 and
  2.  Morton Ann 
Gernsbacher<http://pss.sagepub.com/search?author1=Morton+Ann+Gernsbacher&sortspec=date&submit=Submit>1<http://pss.sagepub.com/content/8/2/106.abstract#aff-1>

+<http://pss.sagepub.com/content/8/2/106.abstract#> Author Affiliations

  1.
1University of Wisconsin-Madison

  1.  Julie Foertsch, LEAD Center, 1402 University Ave, or Morton Ann 
Gernsbacher, Department of Psychology, both at University of Wisconsin-Madison, 
Madison, WI 53706

Abstract

With increasing frequency, writers and speakers are ignoring grammatical 
proscription and using the plural pronoun they to refer to singular 
antecedents. This change may, in part, be motivated by efforts to make language 
more gender inclusive. In the current study, two reading-time experiments 
demonstrated that singular they is a cognitively efficient substitute for 
generic he or she, particularly when the antecedent is nonreferential. In such 
instances, clauses containing they were read (a) much more quickly than clauses 
containing a gendered pronoun that went against the gender stereotype of the 
antecedent, and (b) just as quickly as clauses containing a gendered pronoun 
that matched the stereotype of the antecedent. However, with referential 
antecedents, for which the gender was presumably known, clauses containing 
singular they were not read as quickly as clauses containing a gendered pronoun 
that matched the antecedent's stereotypic gender.


On Feb 7, 2013, at 8:47 PM, Wuensch, Karl L wrote:







          This old fart has never seen from a publisher a restriction that 
would prohibit providing a reprint to an individual.  If a publisher were to 
have such a restriction, I would avoid that publisher like the Medieval plague.

PS – “some one” is singular, but “they” is plural.  The number of a pronoun 
should agree with its antecedent.

Cheers,
<image001.jpg><http://core.ecu.edu/psyc/wuenschk/klw.htm>
From: Deborah S. Briihl [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 8:29 PM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: Re: [tips] Disseminating your published work?

The point was that it was a request. A request is a request, not an order. In 
this case, if some one feels they are breaking copyright rules, then I can see 
why the request would be refused.

And medieval? Well, now that would require a quill, ink, small knife, parchment 
and a scribe. Maybe an illuminator? :)
Deb
Deborah Briihl
Dept of psych and counseling
Valdosta state university
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
 ,Sent from my iPad

On Feb 7, 2013, at 5:11 PM, "Christopher Green" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hmm. What sounded rude (or at least unconscionably snobby) to me, Deb, was 
refusing to pass along an article simply because the requester is not "of the 
guild." How positively Medieval.

Chris
-----
Christopher D. Green
Department of Psychology
York University
Toronto, ON M6C 1G4
Canada

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

On Feb 7, 2013, at 4:32 PM, "Deborah S. Briihl" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:












I know what others have stated, but at this point I would wonder about this 
given the second email, which sounds incredibly rude. If you make a request, 
then the other person can refuse your request. To then accuse you of being 
unprofessional and you should because taxpayers pay our salary blah, blah, blah 
would cause some kind of warning bells in me (and would tick me off).
Deb
Deborah Briihl
Dept of psych and counseling
Valdosta state university
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
 ,Sent from my iPad

On Feb 7, 2013, at 1:41 PM, "Rob Weisskirch" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:







TIPSfolk,

Recently, I got a request for pdfs of two articles I had published.  The 
request came from someone who identified himself as an "independent researcher" 
who claimed not to have access to the two journals (mainstream ones--none that 
were esoteric).  His email did not include his last name nor any affiliation.  
But, it clearly was not spam.

I wrote back and declined to send them because there was not a clear 
affiliation with an university, press, or other organization. He wrote back and 
said that he was shocked, my work is not secret, that it is supported by 
taxpayers, that I'm unprofessional, etc.

I replied again that I did not think that his unaffiliated identity met the 
requirements under the copyright transfer.  I also informed him that I 
respected the journals and if he would provide an affiliation, I'd be happy to 
send the work.

Am I being too picky?

Rob
Rob Weisskirch, MSW. Ph.D.
Professor of Human Development
Certified Family Life Educator
Liberal Studies Department
California State University, Monterey Bay
100 Campus Center, Building 82C
Seaside, CA 93955
(831) 582-5079<tel:%28831%29%20582-5079>
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

This message is intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential, 
privileged information.  If you are not the intended recipient, you may not 
use, copy or disclose any information contained in the message.  If you have 
received this message in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and 
delete the message.

---

You are currently subscribed to tips as: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.

To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13162.50de294b9d4987a3c89b4a5cc4bdea62&n=T&l=tips&o=23533

(It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken)

or send a blank email to 
leave-23533-13162.50de294b9d4987a3c89b4a5cc4bde...@fsulist.frostburg.edu<mailto:leave-23533-13162.50de294b9d4987a3c89b4a5cc4bde...@fsulist.frostburg.edu>







---

You are currently subscribed to tips as: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.

To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=430248.781165b5ef80a3cd2b14721caf62bd92&n=T&l=tips&o=23540

(It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken)

or send a blank email to 
leave-23540-430248.781165b5ef80a3cd2b14721caf62b...@fsulist.frostburg.edu<mailto:leave-23540-430248.781165b5ef80a3cd2b14721caf62b...@fsulist.frostburg.edu>











---

You are currently subscribed to tips as: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.

To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13162.50de294b9d4987a3c89b4a5cc4bdea62&n=T&l=tips&o=23544

(It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken)

or send a blank email to 
leave-23544-13162.50de294b9d4987a3c89b4a5cc4bde...@fsulist.frostburg.edu<mailto:leave-23544-13162.50de294b9d4987a3c89b4a5cc4bde...@fsulist.frostburg.edu>











---

You are currently subscribed to tips as: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.

To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13060.c78b93d4d09ef6235e9d494b3534420e&n=T&l=tips&o=23547

(It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken)

or send a blank email to 
leave-23547-13060.c78b93d4d09ef6235e9d494b35344...@fsulist.frostburg.edu<mailto:leave-23547-13060.c78b93d4d09ef6235e9d494b35344...@fsulist.frostburg.edu>










---

You are currently subscribed to tips as: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.

To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13441.4e79e96ebb5671bdb50111f18f263003&n=T&l=tips&o=23548

(It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken)

or send a blank email to 
leave-23548-13441.4e79e96ebb5671bdb50111f18f263...@fsulist.frostburg.edu<mailto:leave-23548-13441.4e79e96ebb5671bdb50111f18f263...@fsulist.frostburg.edu>






---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=23550
or send a blank email to 
leave-23550-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to