This exchange reminds me of a recent column by David Brooks of the NY Times in 
which he argues that the mission of a university is to produce practical 
knowledge and technical knowledge, 
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/05/opinion/Brooks-The-Practical-University.html. 
Those academics whose letters were published in response to Brooks' column 
revealed an obvious difference of opinion: 
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/09/opinion/what-is-the-mission-of-a-university.html.

Miguel 

  

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Christopher Green" <[email protected]> 
To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)" 
<[email protected]> 
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 12:51:47 PM 
Subject: Re: [tips] Obama on Federal Support of Education 







Alas, we have already seen how this goes -- a classic case of unintended 
consequences. 

They think that the new rating system will make schools (i.e., professors) work 
even harder (because, it is assumed, we have been slacking off somehow on these 
issues... ) to ensure that (the same pool of students we currently have) 
graduate, get employed, and pay off their loans. What in fact will happen (this 
is a prediction; write it down and check back in five years), however, is that 
schools will become (even more) averse to admitting "risky" students (those 
who, because of their socio-economic backgrounds, are historically less likely 
to graduate, get employed, and pay back their loans) because they endanger the 
school's future "rating." 

That is to say, rather than getting an education more focused on their 
employment prospects (the intent), this new system will instead just make it 
even MORE difficult for those who are already poor and who were ill-served by 
the public school system to get even the chance they have at present to obtain 
the education they need to get ahead in life. It is a recipe for creating an 
(even larger) under-educated, impoverished underclass of minimum-wage workers, 
trapped at the station where they were born, with even fewer realistic pathways 
up and out. 

It is a shame. 

Chris 
--- 
Christopher D. Green 
Department of Psychology 
York University 
Toronto, ON M3J 1P3 
Canada 

[email protected] 
http://www.yorku.ca/christo/ 
========================= 

On 2013-08-22, at 11:53 AM, Wuensch, Karl L wrote: 










“It is time to stop subsidizing schools that are not producing good results.” J 
“Good results” means graduation, employment, and pay-back of loans. 
I expect universities will be evaluating departments in the same way. Who pays 
her loans back more reliably – the graduate with a degree in management 
information systems or the one with a degree in psychology? 
Cheers, 

<image001.jpg> 
Karl L. Wuensch, Professor and ECU Scholar/Teacher, Dept. of Psychology 
East Carolina University, Greenville NC 27858-4353, USA, Earth 
Voice: 252-328-9420 Fax: 252-328-6283 
http://core.ecu.edu/psyc/wuenschk/klw.htm 


--- 
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected] . 
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=430248.781165b5ef80a3cd2b14721caf62bd92&n=T&l=tips&o=27245
 
(It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken) 
or send a blank email to 
leave-27245-430248.781165b5ef80a3cd2b14721caf62b...@fsulist.frostburg.edu 









--- 
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected] . 
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=466839.0421d1005414eed82340aa280e7ce629&n=T&l=tips&o=27246
 
(It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken) 
or send a blank email to 
leave-27246-466839.0421d1005414eed82340aa280e7ce...@fsulist.frostburg.edu 





---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=27249
or send a blank email to 
leave-27249-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to