Shaping is a less technical term for the process of reinforcing successive 
approximations to a target behavior.
Chaining is building up a sequence of behaviors, each under stimulus control, 
the sequence ending in a reinforcer.
To oversimplify, one uses shaping (reinforcement of successive approximations) 
to cause a new behavior to occur.  One then uses chaining to combine a number 
of shaped behaviors in sequence to build a more complex behavior.

In the pigeon example, the pigeon was separately shaped through the 
reinforcement of successive approximations to peck a banana, stand on a chair, 
and push a chair.
The pigeon then 'spontaneously' combined these three behaviors into a chain 
terminating in food reinforcement.

I could go into much more detail.
Catania's LEARNING text is a good source.

On Jan 12, 2014, at 6:57 PM, Michael Britt wrote:

> Okay, so what's the difference between chaining, shaping and the method of 
> successive approximations?
> 
> 
> Michael A. Britt, Ph.D.
> [email protected]
> http://www.ThePsychFiles.com
> Twitter: @mbritt
> 
> On Jan 12, 2014, at 10:57 AM, Paul Brandon <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> There was a classic film many many years ago from Skinner's lab (may have 
>> been by Robert Epstein) showing a pigeon trained separately to push a chair, 
>> and to stand on a chair to peck at a cardboard banana (a clear riff on 
>> Kohler).
>> The pigeon spontaneously combined the two behaviors into a chain that had 
>> not been explicitly taught, looking at the banana, then the chair, then 
>> pushing the chair under the banana (with much sighting) until it could stand 
>> on the chair and peck the banana.
>> 
>> On Jan 12, 2014, at 9:08 AM, Christopher Green wrote:
>> 
>>> I friend sent this to me yesterday. It looks trained to me, especially the 
>>> dog nosing the chair over to the counter. An who leaves food sitting in 
>>> their toaster oven in the morning, especially if one has a dog? 
>>> 
>>> Chris
>>> ---
>>> Christopher D. Green
>>> Department of Psychology
>>> York University
>>> Toronto, ON M3J 1P3
>>> Canada
>>> 
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://www.yorku.ca/christo/
>>> =========================
>>> 
>>> On 2014-01-12, at 8:29 AM, Michael Britt wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Here's a fun video I discovered (after almost 2 million people already 
>>>> discovered it) that shows a dog figuring out how to get at some food.  The 
>>>> video reminded me of the Kohler's research.  A good example to talk about 
>>>> while discussing Kohler or during a discussion on intelligence/cognition 
>>>> or learning.  is this a "smart dog" (anthropomorphism) or  an example of 
>>>> behavioral chaining?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Michael A. Britt, Ph.D.
>> 

Paul Brandon
Emeritus Professor of Psychology
Minnesota State University, Mankato
[email protected]




---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=32677
or send a blank email to 
leave-32677-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to