Jeremy Sullivan wrote:
> I understand that a wireless network bandwidth is shared (like a hub), not 
> switched or dedicated
>
> I have two Humax 80 hour series 2 Tivo's.  (T800, is it?)
>
> To summarize (briefly, and possibly inaccurately) the thread to this point:  
> The actual throughput bottleneck isn't the wireless network or even the USB 
> port on the TiVo.  It's the TiVo processor itself, which has to do quite a 
> lot of work when passing network data.  The TiVo wireless G adapter is faster 
> because it has technology to offload much work from the main TiVo unit.
If your Tivos aren't hacked (or aren't going to be -- the Humax boxes 
require a PROM mod to hack if I recall) then it probably won't make much 
difference to you.  Wired might be a bit faster, but not enough that 
you'll notice a significant gap. 

(You can definitely get much better performance with wired adapters if 
you hack the boxes and go through some tuning steps, FWIW.)

--chris

Reply via email to