I can see some value in having this IANA registry list for ciphersuites in the way being proposed (even if it may be interpreted differently by different audiences). There have been, of course, too many algorithms used only in specific countries and those substantially increased the ciphersuite list.
I am just a little bit worried that everything developed for the IoT enviroment is quite likely labled as not recommended by the IETF in this registry because of the Web focus in this group. The JPAKE is the item that we are currently interested in because we have contributed to the standardization work related to Thread and the stack we had implemented. Of course, the remark that JPAKE might not be a good fit for TLS 1.3 may be correct. Ciao Hannes On 03/31/2016 07:25 PM, Salz, Rich wrote: >> Interesting idea. You see this IANA registry more as the mandatory to >> implement algorithm list (for Web apps). > > I don't. But lots of outsiders do, and I know they exert pressure on various > projects and TLS/AD "leadership". I've only had a little bit of it via > openssl compared to those folks. > > -- > Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies > IM: richs...@jabber.at Twitter: RichSalz > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
