Hannes, Aside from JPAKE, which algorithms are you concerned about?
-Ekr On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Hannes Tschofenig < hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net> wrote: > I can see some value in having this IANA registry list for ciphersuites > in the way being proposed (even if it may be interpreted differently by > different audiences). There have been, of course, too many algorithms > used only in specific countries and those substantially increased the > ciphersuite list. > > I am just a little bit worried that everything developed for the IoT > enviroment is quite likely labled as not recommended by the IETF in this > registry because of the Web focus in this group. > > The JPAKE is the item that we are currently interested in because we > have contributed to the standardization work related to Thread and the > stack we had implemented. Of course, the remark that JPAKE might not be > a good fit for TLS 1.3 may be correct. > > Ciao > Hannes > > On 03/31/2016 07:25 PM, Salz, Rich wrote: > >> Interesting idea. You see this IANA registry more as the mandatory to > >> implement algorithm list (for Web apps). > > > > I don't. But lots of outsiders do, and I know they exert pressure on > various projects and TLS/AD "leadership". I've only had a little bit of it > via openssl compared to those folks. > > > > -- > > Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies > > IM: richs...@jabber.at Twitter: RichSalz > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
