> I understand your concern over what the nation-state actors are doing but it > is not the same as what Enterprises do to manage their private servers, > networks and clients.
Okay, in technical terms only, what is the difference? > My personal perspective would be, that the approach to achieving an answer > to that important question, would start with: It's too late for that. We're at the end-game, not the start. I'm only a WG member, not editor, chair, or Area Director, but I would be extremely surprised if there was any consensus to delay things. > What I would like to see come out of the debate we seem to be currently > involved in, is the realization that significant operational/management I hope you don't take this the wrong way, but I don't see that we're having a debate. I see a couple of new WG members re-raising an issue that the WG decided years ago. And that the rest of the WG is pretty consistently expressing their, shall we call it, lack of interest? And some people have offered TLS 1.2, end-point-based interception, and static key shares as ways to address it. And I haven’t seen a response to those suggestions. Your most effective course of action is to come up with a specific proposal, and probably within a week or two. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
