On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 1:52 AM, Salz, Rich <rs...@akamai.com> wrote:
> I would also like to understand why TLS 1.2 is not sufficient for, say, > the next five years. > It probably is ... but isn't that the problem? If the answer is "Just let them stay on TLS1.2", I find it very hard to interpret the arguments against all of this as resulting in anything other than grand-standing. Clearly the users would be no better off, and also end up denied the other benefits of TLS1.3. This seems self-defeating, when there is so easy a path that may improve things for all cases (forbid static-DH, add an opt-in mechanism instead). -- Colm
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
