Hi Nalini, вт, 13 мар. 2018 г., 11:59 nalini elkins <nalini.elk...@e-dco.com>:
> The TLS working group has been concentrating on making the Internet secure > for the individual user. We feel that there is also an underlying > motivation to help the underdog and protect the political dissident. > This isn't about dissidents, this is all about the proper design. This ID helps explain the situation and subsequent need. If you haven’t > had a chance to read it yet, please try to do it before the London meeting. > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fenter-tls-decryption/ > I've read this document and have already proposed spawning a separate thread discussing that before we'll land in London. Probably even before the agenda will be confirmed. Or even better, discussing draft-fenter there instead of draft-rhrd. IMO draft-fenter is much more important, because it is a problem statement, and it's better to settle on a problem statement before discussing solution which is "tls visibility". And, for me, personally, the problem statement in draft-fenter is not convincing. >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
