I like the mechanism, and therefore support it’s adoption. Regards, Uri
> On Mar 31, 2021, at 12:18, Salz, Rich <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > We had a presentation on TLS opaque at IETF 110, but we have not had much > discussion of this document on the list. The chairs would like to see more > discussion on the document before considering it for adoption. There is at > least one question on the list that has gone unanswered for some time [1]. > > I don’t have an opinion on the mechanism or on adoption. > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
