On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 9:39 PM Joseph Salowey <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Folks, > > We had a presentation on TLS opaque at IETF 110, but we have not had much > discussion of this document on the list. The chairs would like to see more > discussion on the document before considering it for adoption. > The draft is interesting, but I'm not sure I really agree with the approach the draft takes with regard to the TLS key schedule. It seems fine to debate in the WG, though. > There is at least one question on the list that has gone unanswered for > some time [1]. > > [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/yCBYp10QuYPSu5zOoM3v84SAIZE/ > I've found most of the OPAQUE drafts are pretty confusing / incorrect / or typo'd when it comes to lines like these. Describing these calculations seems difficult in ASCII, so I don't fault anyone for making mistakes here. The authors have also been pretty responsive in adding test vectors and such. thanks, Rob
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
