I support adoption. We've seen interest in adding PAKE to TLS several times, including in RFC 5054, recent drafts, etc. Having the selected PAKE from the CFRG in TLS is important.
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 9:39 PM Joseph Salowey <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > We had a presentation on TLS opaque at IETF 110, but we have not had much > discussion of this document on the list. The chairs would like to see more > discussion on the document before considering it for adoption. There is at > least one question on the list that has gone unanswered for some time [1]. > > Cheers, > > Joe, Sean, and Chris > > [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/yCBYp10QuYPSu5zOoM3v84SAIZE/ > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls -- Astra mortemque praestare gradatim _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
