I support adoption. I also support making TLS 1.2 not recommended, discouraged, and deprecated. TLS 1.2 can be anything from quite good to very bad depending on configuration. Any work on TLS 1.2 is just delaying deployment of TLS 1.3.
Cheers, John Preuß Mattsson From: TLS <tls-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Christopher Patton <cpatton=40cloudflare....@dmarc.ietf.org> Date: Wednesday, 6 December 2023 at 17:03 To: Deirdre Connolly <durumcrustu...@gmail.com> Cc: TLS@ietf.org <tls@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [TLS] Adoption call for 'TLS 1.2 Feature Freeze' I support adoption. Chris P. On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 9:34 PM Deirdre Connolly <durumcrustu...@gmail.com<mailto:durumcrustu...@gmail.com>> wrote: At the TLS meeting at IETF 118 there was significant support for the draft 'TLS 1.2 is in Feature Freeze' (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rsalz-tls-tls12-frozen/) This call is to confirm this on the list. Please indicate if you support the adoption of this draft and are willing to review and contribute text. If you do not support adoption of this draft please indicate why. This call will close on December 20, 2023. Thanks, Deirdre, Joe, and Sean _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org<mailto:TLS@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
