Hiya,
On 13/02/2026 09:31, John Mattsson wrote:
Additionally, public accusations that those supportive of publishing standalone ML-KEM are corrupt NSA collaborators have likely subjugated others to not feel at liberty of expressing similar opinions.
I agree that over-personalising things like that especially when combined with speculation as to people's motives, is undesirable for many reasons. IMO we should keep in mind that it's the sigint agencies (such as NSA and GCHQ) that are the adversaries, based on their demonstrated activities over the decades, even if some of their employees do other good things. That does speak to this draft though: the supposed justification for avoiding hybrid KEMs doesn't stack up and seems to originate from sigint agencies - that's just a smelly combination. Cheers, S.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
