Andrew, I guess your point is that people who are not cryptography experts but are academics and do understand how research is done should nevertheless not concern themselves with whether such studies have been replicated? We should just assume that individual experts are right and have not made mistakes?
Forgive me, but I don't think this is how science works. Rich's question makes perfect sense to me. What doesn't make sense is anyone here engaging in vituperative attacks in response to his question. On Mon, Jun 8, 2026, at 5:51 PM, Andrew Lee wrote: > On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 8:18 AM Salz, Rich <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> I am not qualified to review your work. Nor am I qualified to review most of >> what Karthik or Cas writes about. > > Mr. Salz, with all due respect, why are you making comments about the > qualifications of his work when you, yourself, admit that you are "not > qualified to review" his work? This seems, at the least, disingenuous. > > To be clear, I respect you and everyone here on this, and generally the IETF > lists, and sincerely hope we can all get back to the material and factual > research instead of attacking the messenger. > > Sincerely with all respect, > Andrew > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
