On Mon, 8 Jun 2026, Nadim Kobeissi wrote:
I’m not even done.
You should be, if this is the tone you intend to use to foster community and be part of consensus decisions. Disagreement is fine. Insulting is not. And instead of firing off 8 messages/day, perhaps gather your thoughts, separate them from your emotions, and write one constructive email instead. I agree with Rich about citations of work. It has nothing to do with personal views. If we cite academic work, we do that via academic references and not via personal home pages. Not just because of the misisng peer reviews, but also because of the historical poor hygiene of long lived URLs on personal home pages. This is unrelated to the specific individual. Rich did not make a personal attack to you. Your answer however, was a personal attack. In general, the TLS WG and its list have become defacto unusable for TLS development because of the curent barrage of emails by few individuals on a single topic that will never see covergence (and luckilly, that is not needed as it doesn't involve MTI items of TLS). The current rate is 400 messages/month. This is driving away people and is doing damage to the continued development of TLS far beyond whether or not there will be a crypto codepoint people can decide to use or not. Paul _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
