Rich, seriously, cut it out. If you want to critique a work, critique it by reading it and providing technical, scientific rebuttals against it.
Counting the number of authors or the publication venue is such a stupid way to critique scientific work. This is the second time you make this idiotic claim. It’s deeply stupid. That’s not how you critique someone’s work or judge its value. I am absolutely certain that if the paper was *also* published on ePrint and *also* had a single author, but that author’s name was Karthikeyan Bhargavan or Cas Cremers, you wouldn’t be repeating this deeply brain-dead line of reasoning. Nadim Kobeissi Symbolic Software • https://symbolic.software > On 8 Jun 2026, at 4:39 PM, Salz, Rich <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > On 6/8/26, 12:28 AM, "Nathanael Ritz" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Independent machine-checked symbolic analysis using ProVerif [REF] > > This gives too much credit to one individual’s work that is not in a > peer-reviewed journal or conference. Nothing against Nadim, he deserves all > the credit for what he did, but let’s not overstate it. For example, maybe > the first word should be “An …" > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
