I support publication as an RFC. An Internet Draft with codepoints is not sufficient as most SDOs (including the IETF) won't allow their standards to cite I-Ds normatively.
Peter > -----Original Message----- > From: Joseph Salowey via Datatracker <[email protected]> > Sent: 24 June 2026 16:00 > To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: [TLS] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-mlkem-08 (Ends 2026-07-08) > > This message initiates a new Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-tls- > mlkem[1], which defines standalone ML-KEM key establishment for TLS 1.3. > The main question before the working group is: "Should the working group > publish a document specifying stand alone ML-KEM?". > - Liaisons: We received liaison statements from multiple SDOs including O- > RAN[2], IEEE 802.11[4] and from 3GPP[3] expressing support for the > publication of draft-ietf-tls-mlkem as an RFC as they rely on the IETF to > provide a stable normative reference. > Joe and Sean _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
