We have our IETF-recommended approach: hybrid. For those who need the alternative, we have a strong use case (a single migration step) for those who are willing or required to deviate from the IETF recommendation.
I support publication. On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 2:14 PM Yaakov Stein <ystein= [email protected]> wrote: > > It makes sense to let the user pick what suits best. That has been the > traditional approach at IETF > > > > Actually, the traditional approach at the IETF has been to sanction a > single mandatory-to-implement approach > > supplemented by optional-to-implement alternatives when these have strong > use cases not well treated by the mandatory approach. > > > > Y(J)S > > > > > > > This message is intended only for the designated recipient(s). It may > contain confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the > designated recipient, you may not review, copy or distribute this message. > If you have mistakenly received this message, please notify the sender by a > reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you. > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
