On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 10:49 AM Justin Schnurbusch <schnurbusch.justin= [email protected]> wrote:
> I do not support the publication of this document as it seems to me that > the implementations "in the field" need a currently secure baseline as a > mandatory border. > > A more baseline-mandatory approach with an optional component seems more > reasonable to me. > I'd like to make sure I understand your position: Are you saying that if some hybrid (e.g., X25519-MLKEM) were MTI, you would support this draft? -Ekr
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
