On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 2:49 AM Nadim Kobeissi <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi everyone, > > Thanks Rich for these meeting notes. > > I’m a bit alarmed at the following item in the notes: > > "Poll: Should chairs be more draconian in doing moderation? y/n/no-opinion > 65/2/7” > > The Cambridge Dictionary defines “draconian” as “goes further than what is > right or necessary”. Um… is “draconian” really the term that was used by > the poll? > Yes. And were those really the results of the poll? > Plus or minus. It takes a while for the session to be posted, so I don't have the exact numbers to hand to verify, but I assume Rich transcribed this in real time. > Who proposed a poll where the chairs are being asked to “go further than > what is right or necessary”, > The chairs proposed the poll with this wording. There was a bit of discussion about the wording, IIRC, and I think people largely understood this to mean that the chairs should be moderating more actively. > and who’s supporting this? > People's individual positions aren't recorded, but a number of people expressed support for more active moderation, including me. This is creepy to say the least. > I don't think so. I would suggest you watch the recording so you can see the discussion in context. -Ekr
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
