Nadim, fundamentally, you can always read documents to support your own 
perspective. That's human nature. 

What you are seeing in this discussion is that a massive majority of working 
group participants believe that your perspective is mistaken. You can of course 
continue to insist that it is not, and this is your right and privilege. But 
what you are hearing is that we, the working group, would really like to stop 
being bombarded by repeated messages where someone who is in the rough (go read 
RFC7282 if you don't know what that phrase means) insists on re-litigating a 
point that's been resolved to the satisfaction of the working group.

This amounts to a denial-of-service attack, and works very much against the 
open process in the iETF. Most of us do IETF standards work in support of a day 
job where we are paid to write software or maintain systems, not to endlessly 
debate standards. So this behavior makes it too expensive for us to participate.

This is really important, Nadim. I've done both sorts of jobs—I had a job for a 
long time that paid me to do standards work as my main task, and I could spend 
as much time as I wanted discussing what I thought. Now I have a job where I'm 
building things. I think the quality of my work has improved a lot as a result 
of this, but at the expense of my ability to participate when working groups 
turn toxic as a result of these denial-of-service attacks. The IETF needs 
practitioners, not just standards wonks. No criticism to either group: this is 
a pracitcal matter.

So when you read that document, please, keep this in mind. There is a HUGE cost 
to the kind of discourse that we've had on the TLS mailing list the past month. 
You seem to be a considerate person, and I think you're doing your best, but 
there's a reason the consensus on "draconian" moderation came out the way it 
did, and you really should pay attention and not just assume we're all jerks 
who are out to suppress your opinions.

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to