"Todd A. Jacobs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Heh. Well, as I said, I can do what I need in procmail. I guess I'd > just like to see tmda eventually be able to act as a full > replacement for procmail, and not have to split my processing up > between the two so much.
Well, I'm not sure TMDA will ever be a full procmail replacement, as that's not really its charter. It's only due to Tim's overenthusiasm <wink> that TMDA's filtering language is as powerful as it is. _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
