Yeah, It's been suggested to me by one of my co-workers that SpamAssassin may be the way to go. We run qmail/vpopmail/mysql and even though RBL's are site-wide, we would like to keep TMDA & SpamAssassin set up on a per user basis. Would you be confident in saying that SpamAssassin is accurate enough to trust with automatically reporting to an RBL such as SpamCop? Thanks.
-Chris -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Forrest Aldrich Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 12:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: SpamCop reporting You could also try using SpamAssassin. After being run for a while, you'll find that SA is extremely accurate at identifying and tagging spam. It's the best product of this type I've ever seen, but can be a little involved to set up properly. Along with that, and after some time of the SA Bayes engine learning, you might be able to utilize spamassassin-milter (presuming you use Sendmail) to act upon SPAM at that level. I use SpamAssassin in conjunction with MailScanner (http://www.mailscanner.info) which offers quite a bit of flexibility (and it's free). Forrest _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
