Forrest Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> You could also try using SpamAssassin. After being run for a while, > you'll find that SA is extremely accurate at identifying and tagging > spam. It's the best product of this type I've ever seen, but can be > a little involved to set up properly. >From what I read there is a solution that is even more accurate than SA - it's Bogofilter. I haven't used it yet, but friends [also admins] who use it and made some tests on large domains stated that the accuracy of properly 'fed' Bogofilter is way better than SpamAssassin's. Bogofilter's also based on Bayesian filtering, just as the SA module is. -- tomasz 'tonid' nidecki, zoliborz, warszawa, poland [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tonid.net http://endemic.org 'nie przejmuj sie, przytul glonojada' (c)hubertus [spamtrap: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
