-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 08:10:32AM -0700, Chris Berry wrote:
>I went farther and made it so that TMDA is only invoked for messages which >get a high Spamassassin score (over 3.0 in my case). This way, nearly all >legitimate mail is delivered without any interference at all. Interesting! I've been thinking about doing something similar. My plan was to set up SpamAssassin again and make up values for "really bad" and "really good". Really bad messages would be held with no challenge (or dropped). Really good messages would go through with no challenge. Stuff in the middle would get treated the way it does today. Thing is, I'd like SpamAssassin to know about my TMDA white list, but it doesn't have the same format. I wrote (but didn't finish) a Perl script to do the conversion, but I haven't set it up yet. Anyway, what caught my eye about your comment is that 3.0 is a high score. I remember 5.0 being a low score. I was thinking in my setup above, 15 would be the "too horrible to waste time challenging" score and 1.0 would be the "so good I don't care if it's not white listed" score. Ultimately I'll probably take a big chunks of ham and spam and see how they fall in SA's scoring and decide from there. - -- Kyle Hasselbacher | How much net work could a network work, [EMAIL PROTECTED] | if a network could net work? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/Rj0w10sofiqUxIQRArihAKDaZttdd9xjWvbVuOWe18SG16LlWwCgtCHC HUATzAN4RNPsUdYvPC2qqdU= =xLTE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
