Erik Max Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Right, it's possible to write general negating regular expressions, but > it gets progressively more and more difficult the more complicated the > expression is. And, it seems to me, with multiple negation tests that > you want to perform, it gets rapidly beyond control. > > It just seemed to me that negation for most of the sourcing patterns > seemed like an obvious feature that wasn't present.
I don't have any problem with this feature. I've added it to the TODO list. If it's something you'd like to see sooner rather than later, feel free to take a hack at it. _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
